- 期刊Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE(J Vis Exp)
- 发表时间2026-10-09
- 作者Li B, Xu X
- 文献类型Video-Audio Media, Review
- DOI10.3791/73941
- PMID42858055
摘要机译
中医(TCM)越来越多地被研究为传统治疗慢性和复杂疾病的辅助方法,包括癌症和类风湿关节炎(RA)。
尽管癌症和类风湿性关节炎在发病机制和治疗目标上有很大差异,但两者都与持续症状负担、治疗相关不良反应、身体功能受损、心理困扰和长期支持性护理需求有关。这篇叙述性综述在这一共享辅助护理框架内评估中医,同时保持对现有证据的疾病特异性解释。
在癌症方面,中医相关干预措施已被研究用于支持症状管理、疼痛缓解、治疗耐受性、生活质量改善和生物学过程的潜在调节,包括凋亡、血管生成、免疫调节、侵袭、转移和多药耐药性。
在类风湿关节炎中,中草药、针灸和相关方法已经被评估它们对疼痛、炎症、身体功能、骨骼重塑和早期疾病相关过程的潜在影响。中医相关的身心实践,如气功和太极,也可以提供心理支持,而基于正念的干预被认为是支持性护理策略,而不是中医干预。
目前的证据范围从机械和临床前研究到观察性研究、单臂临床研究、随机对照试验、系统评价和荟萃分析,方法质量有很大差异。总体而言,中医应该被视为已建立的肿瘤或风湿病治疗的潜在补充,而不是替代。
需要进一步精心设计的临床研究、标准化干预、严格的质量控制、安全监测和有临床意义的结果评估来定义其在多学科护理中的适当作用。
展开英文摘要原文
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has increasingly been investigated as an adjunctive approach to conventional treatment in chronic and complex diseases, including cancer and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although cancer and RA differ substantially in pathogenesis and therapeutic goals, both are associated with persistent symptom burden, treatment-related adverse effects, impaired physical function, psychological distress, and long-term supportive-care needs. This narrative review evaluates TCM within this shared adjunctive-care framework while maintaining disease-specific interpretation of the available evidence. In cancer, TCM-related interventions have been investigated for supportive symptom management, pain relief, treatment tolerance, quality-of-life improvement, and potential modulation of biological processes, including apoptosis, angiogenesis, immune regulation, invasion, metastasis, and multidrug resistance. In RA, Chinese herbal medicines, acupuncture, and related approaches have been evaluated for their potential effects on pain, inflammation, physical function, bone remodeling, and early disease-related processes. TCM-related mind-body practices, such as qigong and tai chi, may also provide psychological support, whereas mindfulness-based interventions are considered supportive-care strategies rather than TCM interventions. Current evidence ranges from mechanistic and preclinical studies to observational studies, single-arm clinical studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, with substantial variation in methodological quality. Overall, TCM should be considered a potential complement to, rather than a replacement for, established oncological or rheumatological treatment. Further well-designed clinical studies, standardized interventions, rigorous quality control, safety monitoring, and clinically meaningful outcome assessment are required to define its appropriate role in multidisciplinary care.
本页由系统自动抓取 PubMed 元数据生成;标题与摘要版权归原作者与期刊所有;机译内容仅供参考,请以英文原文为准;收录不代表本站观点,亦不作为用药或医疗建议。