- 期刊Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE(J Vis Exp)
- 发表时间2026-10-30
- 作者Zhong Y, Xia H, Zou Y, Ying D, Liu N, Wang X
- 文献类型Video-Audio Media, Randomized Controlled Trial
- DOI10.3791/71982
- PMID42965343
摘要机译
中度至重度囊性痤疮难以管理,因为活动性炎性病变通常与持续红斑、疤痕和痤疮相关生活质量损害的风险共存。本研究评估了综合中药方案结合密火针疗法和发光二极管红蓝光疗法的短期病变控制和治疗后后遗症结果。
60例中重度囊性痤疮患者纳入单中心、平行组临床研究,随机分为对照组或实验组,对照组口服异维A酸、红蓝光照射,实验组口服加减知柏地黄丸联合二至丸、密火针治疗,同红蓝光照射。
两组都使用局部阿达帕林,并接受相同的皮肤护理和生活方式指导。结果在基线、三个疗程后和六个疗程后进行评估。治疗后响应者随访队列仅包括治愈或显著改善的患者,因此不保留最初的随机比较。
两种方案都降低了全球痤疮分级系统评分、病变计数和痤疮残疾指数评分;组间值在三个和六个疗程后有利于综合方案组。cure-plus-marked-response比例在对照组为46.67%,在实验组为76.67%;各组之间的临床反应顺序分布不同,而不良事件发生率没有显著差异。
在选定的应答者队列中,实验组在第1-3个月的痤疮疤痕、温哥华疤痕量表和基于成像的红斑评分较低。随机短期发现支持对综合方案的进一步评估,而仅应答者的随访发现应被认为是探索性的,需要在完全随机队列之后的研究中得到确认。
展开英文摘要原文
Moderate-to-severe cystic acne is difficult to manage because active inflammatory lesions often coexist with a risk of persistent erythema, scarring, and acne-related quality-of-life impairment. This study evaluated an integrated traditional Chinese medicine regimen combined with mili-fire needle therapy and light-emitting diode red-blue phototherapy for short-term lesion control and post-treatment sequelae outcomes. Sixty patients with moderate-to-severe cystic acne were enrolled in a single-center, parallel-group clinical study and randomly assigned to a control group or treatment group. The control group received oral isotretinoin and red-blue light irradiation, while the treatment group received modified Zhibai Dihuang Wan combined with Erzhi Wan, mili-fire needle therapy, and the same red-blue light irradiation. Both groups used topical adapalene and received identical skin-care and lifestyle guidance. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after three treatment courses, and after six treatment courses. A post-treatment responder follow-up cohort included only patients who achieved cure or marked improvement and therefore did not preserve the original randomized comparison. Both regimens reduced Global Acne Grading System scores, lesion counts, and Acne Disability Index scores; between-group values favored the integrated-regimen group after three and six courses. The cure-plus-marked-response proportions were 46.67% in the control group and 76.67% in the treatment group; the ordinal clinical-response distribution differed between groups, whereas adverse-event rates did not differ significantly. In the selected responder cohort, the treatment group had lower acne scar, Vancouver Scar Scale, and imaging-based erythema scores during months 1-3. The randomized short-term findings support further evaluation of the integrated regimen, while the responder-only follow-up findings should be considered exploratory and require confirmation in studies that follow the full randomized cohort.
本页由系统自动抓取 PubMed 元数据生成;标题与摘要版权归原作者与期刊所有;机译内容仅供参考,请以英文原文为准;收录不代表本站观点,亦不作为用药或医疗建议。